In some cases, we visited social media websites or professional forums to try to confirm or deny the findings.īelow, we present our results in a table with the following columns: Site Name, Saving Content, Using Content, and Governing Country. For each website, we performed a WHOIS search to compare the service country location presented on the website with the one published in the WHOIS database. We looked for information related to: data protection, licensing, scanning / storing / use of submitted content, liability limitations, and service location / governing law.ģ. We visited each website and checked the following pages or sections (when applicable): Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Frequently Asked Questions, Support Forums, Warnings, and Disclaimers.Ģ. The final result comprised 32 websites (a medium-sized statistical sample).ġ. We compiled a list of potential websites and tested the tools available without registration or payment. We visited several websites that featured reviews of online plagiarism tools and added them to the list.ģ. We searched Google and Bing using the following search terms: 'plagiarism checkers,' 'plagiarism software,' 'free plagiarism checker tools', 'online plagiarism checkers,' 'plagiarism detection', 'plagiarism scanner', 'plagiarism test,' 'plagiarism analysis,' 'duplicate text search', 'plagiarism software for students and teachers.'Ģ. Is using plagiarism-checking software as helpful, worry-free, and reliable as advertised?ġ.Does the word 'free' have any unexpected strings attached?.Are online plagiarism-detection tools safe to use as far as data protection, licensing of the submitted content, intellectual property, and user privacy are concerned?.The goal of this study was to answer these questions: Plagiarism Checker Tools vs Content Security, Licensing, and Privacy Practices

Plagiarism checker free online students